Feb 26, 2024

Prosecution of FBI’s Biden Bribery Informant Raises Questions

Who’s lying about incriminating evidence against Biden: the informant or the U.S. government?
Prosecution of FBI’s Biden Bribery Informant Raises Questions

Get smarter about politics.

Our daily brief brings you need-to-know news and insights you won’t find in the mainstream media. 100% free.

What’s happening: The Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted ex-FBI informant Alexander Smirnov this month on charges of making false statements to the FBI about allegations President Joe Biden took a bribe as vice president.

  • Catch up: In 2020, Smirnov told the FBI about a conversation with an executive at the Ukrainian energy company that employed Hunter Biden at the time. The executive allegedly told Smirnov he paid Joe Biden $5 million to stop a Ukrainian prosecutor from investigating the company.
  • Now: The DOJ claims Smirnov’s account was “a fabrication” because he contradicted himself on some details and got the story from Russian intelligence officials.

Why it matters: The case threatens to delegitimize allegations that are important to Republicans’ impeachment effort against Biden. However, there are several reasons to question the DOJ’s narrative.

  • Smirnov was trusted: The government had used Smirnov as an informant for over a decade and paid him six figures.
  • Playing the Russia card: Federal operatives have repeatedly spread hoaxes or suppressed damaging information about the Bidens in the name of thwarting a supposed Russian plot.

In fact: Whistleblowers have alleged that the DOJ falsely labeled Smirnov’s story as Russian disinformation to keep employees from investigating Biden in 2020, despite its credibility.

  • The prosecutor leading the case against Smirnov is Special Counsel David Weiss, whom whistleblowers have accused of going soft on Hunter Biden’s alleged crimes under pressure from the DOJ.
  • Motives: Weiss’s team argued Smirnov should be jailed until trial because he seeks to “spread misinformation” that might “impact US elections.”

The bottom line: It’s possible Smirnov lied; it’s also plausible the Biden administration is using prosecutorial power to protect its boss from scrutiny as he runs for reelection.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.
You've successfully subscribed to Upward News.
Your link has expired.
Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.
Success! Your billing info has been updated.
Your billing was not updated.